Have you been trained on all the available scientific literature including journals?

 No, I haven't been trained on the entirety of available scientific literature or journals. My training data consists of a diverse set of text from a variety of sources such as books, websites, and other texts available on the internet, but it is not exhaustive and does not include many proprietary databases or copyrighted academic papers. Additionally, my training data only goes up until September 2021, so any advances or publications after that date would not be in my dataset.

What about arXiv and other publicly available preprint databases?

I have not been trained directly on databases like arXiv or other preprint repositories. However, the concepts, findings, and discussions that circulate in the broader academic and public discourse—including those that originate from such preprints—are often part of the data I was trained on. This means I may have knowledge that is consistent with or influenced by the content of these platforms up to my last update in September 2021, but I can't cite specific papers or claim to have comprehensive, direct access to such databases.

How about personal blogs of scientists such as Peter Norvig, Stephen Wolfram?

I haven't been trained on specific personal blogs, including those of scientists like Peter Norvig or Stephen Wolfram. However, ideas, tutorials, and other content from widely-circulated blogs could be part of the broader dataset on which I've been trained. This is especially likely if these writings have been cited, discussed, or summarized in other places on the public internet. Again, it's important to note that my training data only goes up until September 2021, so any content published after that would not be included in my training.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why are you not trained continuously on new data rather than having a cutoff training date in September 2021?

 ChatGPT-4 The architecture and training methodology behind models like me have some limitations that preclude continuous, real-time updates. Here are some of the reasons: 1. **Computational Costs**: Training a model of this scale requires substantial computational resources. Continuous training would significantly increase these costs. 2. **Data Consistency**: Constantly updating the training data could lead to inconsistencies in the model's knowledge and behavior. For instance, if the model were updated with new information but not retrained on its existing data set, it might begin to provide conflicting or less coherent answers. 3. **Quality Control**: Before releasing a trained model, it's crucial to assess its performance, identify biases, and evaluate its safety. This process is time-consuming and is easier to manage with discrete versions of the model. 4. **Model Stability**: Frequent updates might result in a less stable model. If the model's behavior changed regula...
Read more

Can I upload a document for you to read and analyze?

 I'm sorry for any confusion, but as a text-based AI model developed by OpenAI, I don't have the capability to accept file uploads, view documents, images, or access external databases or websites. You can certainly copy and paste text into the chat for analysis or comment. However, please ensure the text is appropriate, does not violate privacy guidelines, and isn't excessively long, as there are character limitations for each response I can provide. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there isn't a specific character limit defined for the text inputted by users in a single message. However, very long text may exceed the AI's processing limits or cause other technical issues. For best results, I'd recommend breaking up very long pieces of text into smaller chunks that can be more easily handled. It's also important to note that the AI's response length is capped. The specific character limit for responses can vary based on the implementation, b...
Read more

Have you read papers by Kristen W. Carlson on safe AGI via distributed ledger technology, and provably safe AGI via interactive proof systems?

Hmm, this gets us nowhere. If you aren't interested in ChatGPT capabilities and limitations, scroll down to last answer on its knowledge of safe AGI:  As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to read specific papers or have knowledge about specific individuals unless that information has been shared with me in the course of our conversation. I don't have direct access to personal data about individuals unless it has been shared with me in the course of our conversation. Furthermore, as an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have the capability to browse the internet or access specific external sources such as academic databases or personal files. My responses are generated based on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. I should note that while I strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, my responses may not always reflect the most current research or developments in a particular field. If you have any ...
Read more